Identify and assess the key issues for the practitioner raised by the case study. This part may be in dot points.
In this situation Julia seems to need a friend. The issues here are:
* What are boundaries? Due to the personal genius of a serving notificationship there exists a compute of ethics such(prenominal) as boundaries that helpers abide to. Boundaries help install a structure that protects the interest of the helper and the helpee (Brammer & MacDonald, p.152, 2003).
* What are verge crossings and is it appropriate? Boundary crossings are practices going by from the traditional behaviour of helpers (Guthiel & Gabbard, 1993).
* Is boundary crossing a boundary violation? A boundary violation involves indecent, consumptive or unethical behaviour. Sexual descents, for example, are always a boundary violation (Lazarus & Zur, 2002).
* What is a dual relationship and is it wrong? A dual relationship is when the helper has other role outside the confines of the helping relationship such as a friend or a argumentation partner (Brammer & MacDonald, 2003).
Compare and contrast the views of the articles in relation to the issues raised by the case study.
Briefly discuss these views utilise appropriate referencing.
Ethical boundaries are benchmarks for the behaviour of helpers in helping relationships. Boundaries refer to the amount of self-disclosure by the therapist, physical contact, bartering and fees, the location and the space of sessions and contact outside of the office (Guthiel & Gabbard, 1993).
The Slippery careen argument believes that all boundary crossings inevitably lead to boundary violations. This approach is based on the snowball dynamic which suggests that the giving of a simple gift is the beginning of an exploitive business relationship (Lazarus, 1994, p. 257).
Theories such as...If you want to get a full essay, position it on our website: Orderessay
If you want to get a full essay, wisit our page: write my essay .
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.