I inferred that the main reasons why the Americas were conquered were because of their lack of technology and their philosophical sy composition somewhat life. The thing that was one of the overlargegest differences between the two was the situation that the Europeans had big domestic animals. That played a very valuable parting in the conquering and I never stop to regain about it. Animals never have a palpable important role nowadays, but back then in front cars, the Europeans relied on horses to get down them places. The technology of weapons, agri shade, and tools were oft to a greater extent advanced in Europe than in the Americas. This was something that I knew because in former(prenominal) fileings the Indians shown in pictures never had armor, steel swords, guns, or any of that fount of metals. They had spears, bows and arrows, and a lot of wooden weapons. In Europe the farming was much much advanced, so therefore they had a more full(a) variety of foo ds to choose from than the natives did. This was also due to animal dexterity and the tilling of land, which I never stopped to think of. The Europeans goal overall was much more modern than the Native Ameri pots. nearly of the Europeans were literate and could read, but literacy was reserved for a select stem in Native American society.
I did not eff this, but it would be more helpful to the Europeans because they can go across faster and more efficiently than the Natives because virtually of them can read and write. Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â When some things are not important to most multitude in our everyday lives, I dont really stop to consider if those things would relate t o the people in past years. It did not at a! ll cross my sound judgment that the horses were a big part in determining the conquering... If you loss to get a full essay, order it on our website: OrderEssay.net
If you want to get a full information about our service, visit our page: write my essay