In the first approach, students are taught to act based on moral values against plagiarism. Applying the second view, however, plagiarism is seen as break a rule and the emphasis is on law and the consequences of faulting such rules. To reach this end academic institutions are presently using new technologies such as Turnitin, which detects similarities in papers.
There are different reasons explaining why fighting against plagiarism has failed in recent decades. As Blum (2009) mentioned in her article:
Our notion of originality of voice as the product of unique, isolated, authentic self had its peak in 1960s and 1970s.
Students today have been immersed in a shade that revels in trying on different personae and sharing freely
Plagiarism and the meaning of moral oneness have not been formally and completely introduced to students of new generations. Since students are under the force of achieving highest ranking institutions expectations, they pay less attention to the academic integrity norms related to citation and they do not feel some(prenominal) moral responsibility in keeping the discretion of their make words and that of others.
Considering the failure of the aforementioned approaches, Blum (2009) has offered a third approach which suggests that it is the instructors responsibility to show their students honorable academic avenues towards healthy citation which varies across majors. Although students may not understand the...If you want to lease a full essay, order it on our website: Orderessay
If you want to get a full essay, wisit our page: write my essay .
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.